- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases C-255/23 and C-285/23, AVVA and Others (Trial by videoconference in the absence of a European Investigation Order): Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Ekonomisko lietu tiesa – Latvia) – Criminal proceedings against A, B, C, D, F, E, G, SIA AVVA, SIA Liftu alianse (C-255/23), A, B, C, Z, F, AS Latgales Invest Holding , SIA METEOR HOLDING , METEOR Kettenfabrik GmbH, SIA Tool Industry , AS Ditton pievadķēžu rūpnīca (C-285/23) (References for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European Investigation Order – Directive 2014/41/EU – Article 24 – Hearing by videoconference or other audiovisual transmission – Criminal prosecution initiated in a Member State against a person residing in another Member State – Possibility for that person to participate in his or her trial by videoconference in the absence of a European Investigation Order)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0255
62023CA0255
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/4437
22.7.2024
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Ekonomisko lietu tiesa – Latvia) – Criminal proceedings against A, B, C, D, F, E, G, SIA ‘AVVA’, SIA ‘Liftu alianse’ (C-255/23), A, B, C, Z, F, AS ‘Latgales Invest Holding’, SIA ‘METEOR HOLDING’, METEOR Kettenfabrik GmbH, SIA ‘Tool Industry’, AS ‘Ditton pievadķēžu rūpnīca’ (C-285/23)
(Joined Cases C-255/23 and C-285/23, AVVA and Others (Trial by videoconference in the absence of a European Investigation Order))
(References for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European Investigation Order - Directive 2014/41/EU - Article 24 - Hearing by videoconference or other audiovisual transmission - Criminal prosecution initiated in a Member State against a person residing in another Member State - Possibility for that person to participate in his or her trial by videoconference in the absence of a European Investigation Order)
(C/2024/4437)
Language of the case: Latvian
Referring court
Parties in the main proceedings
C-255/23: A, B, C, D, F, E, G, SIA ‘AVVA’, SIA ‘Liftu alianse’
Intervening party: Rīgas tiesas apgabala prokuratūra
C-285/23: A, B, C, Z, F, AS ‘Latgales Invest Holding’, SIA ‘METEOR HOLDING’, METEOR Kettenfabrik GmbH, SIA ‘Tool Industry’, AS ‘Ditton pievadķēžu rūpnīca’
Intervening parties: Latvijas Investīciju un attīstības aģentūra, Rīgas tiesas apgabala prokuratūra
Operative part of the judgment
There is no need to rule on the requests for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Ekonomisko lietu tiesa (Economic Court, Latvia), by decisions of 28 March 2023 and 21 April 2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4437/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—