EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-652/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — HW, ZF, MZ v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction in insurance matters — Article 11(1)(b) — Action brought by the policyholder, the insured person or a beneficiary — Possibility of bringing proceedings against the insurer before a court of the place where the person bringing the claim is domiciled — Determination of the international and territorial jurisdiction of a court of a Member State — Article 13(2) — Direct action brought by the injured party against the insurer — Insurer domiciled in a Member State with an establishment in another Member State sued in the court of the place where that establishment is situated)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0652

62020CA0652

June 30, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/4

(Case C-652/20)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Jurisdiction in insurance matters - Article 11(1)(b) - Action brought by the policyholder, the insured person or a beneficiary - Possibility of bringing proceedings against the insurer before a court of the place where the person bringing the claim is domiciled - Determination of the international and territorial jurisdiction of a court of a Member State - Article 13(2) - Direct action brought by the injured party against the insurer - Insurer domiciled in a Member State with an establishment in another Member State sued in the court of the place where that establishment is situated)

(2022/C 318/04)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: HW, ZF, MZ

Defendant: Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG

Operative part of the judgment

Article 11(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that, where that provision is applicable, it determines both the international jurisdiction and the territorial jurisdiction of the court of a Member State within whose jurisdiction the person bringing the claim is domiciled.

OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia