- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-61/18: Action brought on 5 February 2018 — Rodriguez Prieto v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0061
62018TN0061
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.4.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 134/23
(Case T-61/18)
(2018/C 134/32)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Amador Rodriguez Prieto (Steinsel, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
Declare and rule:
—principally, that the Commission is ordered to remedy the losses suffered and therefore to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 68 831 in respect of his pecuniary loss and EUR 100 000 in respect of his non-pecuniary loss;
—in the alternative, that the decision of 28 March 2017 refusing assistance is annulled;
—in any event, that the Commission is ordered to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant alleges, principally, that the Commission committed a faute de service in disregarding his status as a whistle-blower, which caused the applicant pecuniary and non-pecuniary harm which it is for the institution to remedy. In the alternative, the applicant argues that the institution failed to have regard to Article 24 of the Staff Regulations by refusing to grant him the assistance provided for in that article after the criminal proceedings.