EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 1 June 1999. # Karl L. Meyer v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities. # Manifest inadmissibility. # Case T-73/99.

ECLI:EU:T:1999:116

61999TO0073

June 1, 1999
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61999B0073

European Court reports 1999 Page II-01739

Summary

Keywords

1 Actions for annulment - Actionable measures - Provision of the Treaty establishing the European Community - Not an actionable measure (Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 44(1)(c))

2 Procedure - Application initiating proceedings - Procedural requirements - Subject-matter of the dispute to be indicated - Pleas in law relied upon to be briefly stated (Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 44(1)(c))

Summary

1 A Treaty provision is not an act of a Community institution within the meaning of Article 4 of the Treaty (now Article 7 EC) or Article 173 thereof (now, after amendment, Article 230 EC); consequently, the Court has no jurisdiction to annul it.

2 Pursuant to Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, an application must state the subject-matter of the proceedings and a summary of the pleas in law on which it is based. That statement must be sufficiently clear and precise to enable the defendants to prepare their defence and the Court to adjudicate on the action, where necessary without any other supporting information. In order to ensure legal certainty and the sound administration of justice, for an action to be admissible, the essential matters of fact and law on which it is based must be indicated, at least in summary form, coherently and intelligibly in the application itself.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia