- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-62/16: Action brought on 15 February 2016 — Puma v EUIPO — Doosan Infracore (PUMA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0062
62016TN0062
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.4.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 118/36
(Case T-62/16)
(2016/C 118/41)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Doosan Infracore Co. Ltd (Incheon, South Korea)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: figurative mark containing the word element ‘PUMA’ — EU trade mark application No 11 376 209
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2015 in Case R 1052/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and Doosan Infracore Co. Ltd. to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.