- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-65/18: Action brought on 6 February 2018 — Venezuela v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0065
62018TN0065
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.4.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 134/24
(Case T-65/18)
(2018/C 134/34)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (represented by: F. Di Gianni and L. Giuliano, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Council Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 of 13 November 2017 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela, insofar as its provisions concern the Applicant; and
—order the Council to bear the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that, by adopting the restrictive measures without previously informing the Applicant of its intention, and without previously hearing the position of the Applicant on the facts allegedly justifying the restrictive measures, the Council infringed the Applicant’s right to be heard.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Council infringed its obligation to state the reasons and to provide sufficient evidence for the adoption of the restrictive measures.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that the Council committed a manifest error of assessment as concerns the facts on which the restrictive measures are based.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the restrictive measures constitute unlawful countermeasures under customary international law.