EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-67/22: Action brought on 1 February 2022 — Guma Holdings v EUIPO — X-Trade Brokers Dom Maklerski (XTRADE)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0067

62022TN0067

February 1, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

28.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/28

(Case T-67/22)

(2022/C 138/33)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Guma Holdings LTD (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: M. Oleksyn and M. Stępkowski, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: X-Trade Brokers Dom Maklerski S.A. (Warsaw, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark XTRADE in the colours dark grey, light grey, blue, shades of blue — European Union trade mark No 13 061 387

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2021 in Case R 981/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

alter the contested decision and reject the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety;

order EUIPO and the intervener to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, including those incurred in the proceedings before EUIPO.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (1);

Infringement of Articles 8(4) and 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Articles 16(1)(b) and 7(2)(d) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.

(1)

JO 2012 C 326, p. 391.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia