- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-215/12: Order of the General Court of 2 October 2014 — MPM-Quality and Eutech v OHIM — Elton Hodinářská (MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949 — Earlier international and national marks PRIM — Bad faith — Article 165(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 41 and 56 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Lack of genuine use of the earlier mark — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TB0215
62012TB0215
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.11.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 421/42
(Case T-215/12)(1)
((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949 - Earlier international and national marks PRIM - Bad faith - Article 165(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Articles 41 and 56 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Lack of genuine use of the earlier mark - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
2014/C 421/59
Language of the case: Czech
Parties
Applicants: MPM-Quality v.o.s. (Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic); and Eutech a.s. (Šternberk, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Kyjovský, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Gája and D. Botis, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Elton Hodinářská a.s. (Nové Mesto nad Metují, Czech Republic) (represented by: T. Matoušek, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 March 2012 (Case R 826/2010-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between (i) MPM-Quality v.o.s. and Eutech a.s. and (ii) Elton Hodinářská a.s.
Operative part of the order
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders MPM-Quality v.o.s. and Eutech a.s to pay the costs.
OJ C 273, 8.9.2012.