I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2018/C 094/45)
Language in which the application was lodged: Slovak
Applicant: Yado s.r.o. (Handlová, Slovakia) (represented by: D. Futej, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dvectis CZ s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: European Union design No 2 371 591-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 November 2017 in Case R 1017/2017-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision declaring the appeal inadmissible;
—order the defendant to deal with the appeal and give a ruling thereon;
—order the defendant to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the present proceedings.
—Error in law for the purpose of Article 57 of Regulation No 6/2002 and Article 65 of Regulation No 2245/2002;
—Infringement of the applicant’s fundamental right to be heard;
—Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation No 6/2002