- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases C-244/23 P to C-246/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 February 2025 – European Commission and Others v Carpatair (Appeal – State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Timişoara International Airport (Romania) in favour of Wizz Air and other airlines using that airport – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Action for annulment – Article 263 TFEU – Admissibility – Condition that the applicant must be directly and individually concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Distortion of the evidence)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0244
62023CA0244
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/1863
7.4.2025
(Joined Cases C-244/23 P to C-246/23 P)
(Appeal - State aid - Aviation sector - Measures implemented by Timişoara International Airport (Romania) in favour of Wizz Air and other airlines using that airport - Decision finding that there is no State aid - Action for annulment - Article 263 TFEU - Admissibility - Condition that the applicant must be directly and individually concerned - Obligation to state reasons - Distortion of the evidence)
(C/2025/1863)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellants: European Commission (represented by: I. Georgiopoulos and F. Tomat, acting as Agents) (C-244/23 P), Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) (represented by: I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, dikigoros, S. Rating, abogado, and E. Vahida, lawyer) (C-245/23 P), Societatea Națională ‘Aeroportul Internaţional Timişoara – Traian Vuia’ SA (AITTV) (represented by: V. Power, Senior Counsel, and R. Hourihan, Solicitor) (C-246/23 P)
Other parties to the proceedings: Carpatair SA (represented by: P. González Alarcón, J. Rivas Andrés, abogados, and J. Saké, advocaat), Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) (represented by: I. G. Metaxas Maranghidis, dikigoros, S. Rating, abogado, and E. Vahida, lawyer), Societatea Națională ‘Aeroportul Internaţional Timişoara – Traian Vuia’ SA (AITTV) (represented by: V. Power, Senior Counsel, and R. Hourihan, Solicitor), European Commission (represented by: I. Georgiopoulos and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 8 February 2023, Carpatair v Commission (T-522/20, EU:T:2023:51);
Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;
Reserves the costs.
—
(1)
OJ C 235, 3.7.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1863/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—