I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 128/38)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicants: Dado Ceramica Srl (San Giovanni in Persiceto, Italy), Antica Ceramica Rubiera Srl (Rubiera, Italy) and Star-Gres sp. z o.o. (Końskie, Poland) (represented by: A. Merlini and F. Carpi, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Italcer SpA (Rubiera, Italy)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design (Piastrelle) — Community design No 6 581 245-0013
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 November 2021 in Case R 1965/2020-3
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity;
—in the alternative, after the annulment of the contested decision, refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of EUIPO and issue appropriate directions regarding the oral phases of the procedure and the admission of new and highly relevant documents;
—order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs of the proceedings and reimburse the costs incurred by the applicants.
—Infringement of Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.