EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-15/09: Action brought on 15 January 2009 — Euro-Information v OHIM (EURO AUTOMATIC CASH)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0015

62009TN0015

January 1, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/48

(Case T-15/09)

(2009/C 69/105)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Européenne de traitement de l'Information (Euro-Information) (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: A. Grolée, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 November 2008, Case R 70/2006-4, in that it refused registration of the Community trade mark application EURO AUTOMATIC CASH No 4 114 864 with regard to the entirety of the goods and services claimed in Classes 9, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 42;

registration of the application for Community trade mark EURO AUTOMATIC CASH No 4 114 864 for all the goods and services referred to in the application filed;

OHIM to be ordered to pay the costs of the applicant incurred in the proceedings before OHIM and in the present action, under Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘EURO AUTOMATIC CASH’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 42 — application No 4 114 864

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the application for registration

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and of Article 7(2) of Council Regulation No 40/94, since the trade mark applied for is not descriptive and has the necessary distinctive character.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia