- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-765/21, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Padova — Italy) — D.M. v Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public health — National legislation imposing a vaccination obligation on health professionals — Suspension from duty without pay for personnel refusing the vaccine — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 — Medicinal products for human use — Vaccines against COVID-19 — Regulation (EC) No 507/2006 — Validity of conditional marketing authorisations — Regulation (EU) 2021/953 — Prohibition of discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0765
62021CA0765
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.9.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 321/7
(Case C-765/21, (1) Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public health - National legislation imposing a vaccination obligation on health professionals - Suspension from duty without pay for personnel refusing the vaccine - Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 - Medicinal products for human use - Vaccines against COVID-19 - Regulation (EC) No 507/2006 - Validity of conditional marketing authorisations - Regulation (EU) 2021/953 - Prohibition of discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons - Inadmissibility)
(2023/C 321/08)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: D.M.
Defendant: Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova,
in the presence of: C. S.
Operative part of the judgment
The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunale ordinario di Padova (District Court, Padua, Italy) by decision of 7 December 2021 is inadmissible.
Language of the case: Italian
* * *
(1) OJ C 138, 28.3.2022.