EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-758/21: Action brought on 1 December 2021 — Dorsum v EUIPO — ID Quantique (Clavis)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0758

62021TN0758

December 1, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/36

(Case T-758/21)

(2022/C 51/49)

Language in which the application was lodged: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Dorsum Informatikai Fejlesztő és Szolgáltató Zrt. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Gy. Hajdu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ID Quantique SA (Carouge, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘Clavis’ — registration No 18064876

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2021 in Case R 189/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

primarily, amend the contested decision and uphold the applicant’s action;

alternatively, annul the contested decision with the effects also extending to the decision issued by EUIPO on 27 November 2020;

order compensation to be paid to the applicant for the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 47(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 107 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of essential procedural requirements.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia