I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 51/49)
Language in which the application was lodged: Hungarian
Applicant: Dorsum Informatikai Fejlesztő és Szolgáltató Zrt. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Gy. Hajdu, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ID Quantique SA (Carouge, Switzerland)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘Clavis’ — registration No 18064876
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2021 in Case R 189/2021-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—primarily, amend the contested decision and uphold the applicant’s action;
—alternatively, annul the contested decision with the effects also extending to the decision issued by EUIPO on 27 November 2020;
—order compensation to be paid to the applicant for the costs of the proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 47(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 107 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of essential procedural requirements.