- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-762/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Haskovo (Bulgaria) lodged on 4 December 2018 — QH v Varhoven kasatsionen sad of the Republic of Bulgaria
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0762
62018CN0762
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.2.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 54/12
(Case C-762/18)
(2019/C 54/16)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: QH
Defendant: Varhoven kasatsionen sad of the Republic of Bulgaria
Questions referred
1.Must Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time be interpreted as precluding national legislation and/or case-law, according to which a worker who has been unfairly dismissed and subsequently reinstated by a court decision, is not entitled to paid annual leave for the period from the date of dismissal until the date of his reinstatement?
2.In the event that the first question is answered in the affirmative, must Article 7(2) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time be interpreted as precluding national legislation and/or case-law, according to which in the event that the employment relationship is terminated once again the worker in question is not entitled to financial compensation for unused paid annual leave for the period from the date of his previous dismissal until the date of his reinstatement?
(1) OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9.
* * *
Language of the case: Bulgarian