I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Plant-protection products - Active substance dichlorvos - Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC - Evaluation procedure - Opinion of an EFSA Scientific Panel - Plea of illegality - Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 - Submission of new studies and data during the evaluation procedure - Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 451/2000 - Article 28(1) of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Principle of sound administration - Rights of the defence - Principle of subsidiarity - Article 95(3) EC and Articles 4(1) and 5(1) of Directive 91/414)
2010/C 11/44
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Denka International BV (Barneveld, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Doherty and L. Parpala, acting as Agents)
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/387/EC of 6 June 2007 concerning the non-inclusion of dichlorvos in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance (OJ 2007 L 145, p. 16)
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Denka International BV to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission of the European Communities.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.