- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-21/15: Action brought on 19 January 2015 — Franmax v OHIM — Ehrmann (Dino)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0021
62015TN0021
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.3.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 107/32
(Case T-21/15)
(2015/C 107/41)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Franmax UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: E. Saukalas, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ehrmann AG Oberschönegg im Allgäu (Oberschönegg, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘Dino’ — Application for registration No 10 809 481
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2014 in Case R 2012/2013-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
Plea(s) in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.