EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-324/25, Lietuvos krepšinio lyga and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 12 May 2025 – Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba v Lietuvos krepšinio lyga and Others

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0324

62025CN0324

May 12, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/4269

11.8.2025

(Case C-324/25, Lietuvos krepšinio lyga and Others)

(C/2025/4269)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant and defendant at first instance: Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba

Other parties to the appeal and applicants at first instance: Lietuvos krepšinio lyga, Všį Utenos Juventus, Všį KK Statyba, Všį Žalgirio krepšinio centras, Všį SSK, Všį Neptūno krepšinio klubas, Všį Veržlusis Nevėžis, Všį Krepšinio klubas Šiauliai, Všį Dzūkijos sportas, now – Všį BC Wolves, Všį Krepšinio klubas Lietkabelis, Bankrupt Všį Krepšinio sporto klubas Prienai

Questions referred

Can an agreement between the basketball clubs and their association, which organises a basketball club championship, not to pay salaries to players employed by the basketball clubs under contracts in force be regarded as an agreement restricting competition by fixing the purchase prices of the basketball players’ services for the purposes of Article 101(1)(a) TFEU?

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, can an agreement such as that at issue in the main proceedings be regarded as an agreement restricting competition by object within the meaning of Article 101(1)(a) TFEU?

For the purposes of Article 101(1)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, read in conjunction with Article 165 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, when deciding on an agreement such as that at issue in the main proceedings, are the economic and legal context of the agreement regarding the onset of the COVID-19 virus pandemic and the relevant restrictions on economic and sporting activities adopted by the public authorities relevant, and ought those circumstances to be taken into account when deciding on the agreement at issue in the case in the main proceedings and the liability of the basketball clubs and their association?

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4269/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia