EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-636/22: Judgment of the General Court of 24 January 2024 — U.I. Lapp v EUIPO — Labkable Asia (labkable Solutions for cables) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark labkable Solutions for cables — Earlier EU figurative marks LAPP KABEL STUTTGART and LAPP KABEL and earlier word mark LAPP — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0636

62022TA0636

January 24, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/2160

25.3.2024

(Case T-636/22) (*)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark labkable Solutions for cables - Earlier EU figurative marks LAPP KABEL STUTTGART and LAPP KABEL and earlier word mark LAPP - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(C/2024/2160)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: U.I. Lapp GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: M. Ringer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Labkable Asia Ltd (Kowloon, China) (represented by: R. Ciullo, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 July 2022 (Case R 1894/2021-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 July 2022 (Case R 1894/2021-2);

2.Upholds the opposition brought against registration of the EU figurative mark LABKABLE SOLUTIONS FOR CABLES submitted on 3 January 2020;

3.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by U.I. Lapp GmbH;

4.Orders Labkable Asia Ltd to bear its own costs.

*

(*) Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2160/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia