- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-340/16: Action brought on 28 June 2016 — Flatworld Solutions/EUIPO — Outsource2India (Outsource 2 India)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0340
62016TN0340
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.8.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 305/47
(Case T-340/16)
(2016/C 305/63)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Flatworld Solutions Pvt. Ltd (Bangalore, India) (represented by: S. Gillert, K. Vanden Bossche, B. Köhn-Gerdes, J. Schumacher, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Outsource2India Ltd (Friedrichshafen, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Outsource 2 India’ — EU trade mark No 6 035 547
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 April 2016 in Case R 611/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in its entirety;
—confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 3 February 2015;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs including the costs incurred by the Applicant.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.