EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-653/24, Accorinvest: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 6 December 2024 – Accorinvest and Société Générale SA v Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0653

62024TN0653

December 6, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/1232

(Case T-653/24, Accorinvest)

(C/2025/1232)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Accorinvest and Société Générale SA

Respondent: Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique

Questions referred

1.Are the provisions of Article 1(2) of Directive 2008/118/EC to be interpreted as meaning that the existence of a legal mechanism for passing on the tax to the final consumer of a product subject to excise duty implies in itself the existence of a direct and inseverable link between that tax and the consumption of that product, with the result that it must be regarded as another indirect tax within the meaning of Article 1(2) of Directive 2008/118/EC, even where that tax is calculated independently of the quantity of product actually consumed?

2.Are the provisions of Article 1(2) of Directive 2008/118/EC to be interpreted as meaning that a tax, such as the tariff-based transmission contribution, which is based on the fixed component of the standing charges for use of the public electricity networks, and excludes the variable part of those charges – which is the only component that varies according to the quantity of electricity consumed – but which is payable under the network access contracts concluded by consumers or their suppliers, has a direct and inseverable link with the consumption of electricity, with the result that it must be regarded as another indirect tax within the meaning of those provisions?

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1232/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia