- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-392/12: Order of the General Court of 26 February 2015 — Lavazza v OHIM — Commercialunione prima (LAVAZZA A MODO MIO) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TB0392
62012TB0392
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.4.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/48
(Case T-392/12)(*1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 138/63)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Luigi Lavazza SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: A. Vanzetti, M. Ricolfi, G. Sironi and C. Mezzetti, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by F. Mattina, subsequently by F. Mattina and N. Bambara, and finally by N. Bambara and P. Bullock, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Commercialunione Prima Srl (Bresso, Italy) (represented by: G. Celona and B. Dosi, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 June 2012 (Case R 124/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Commercialunione Prima Srl and Luigi Lavazza SpA.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The applicant and intervener shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs borne by the defendant.
(*1) OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.