I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2020/C 10/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Agepha Pharma s. r. o. (Senec, Slovakia) (represented by: D. Göbel, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apogepha Arzneimittel GmbH (Dresden, Germany)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark AGEPHA — EU trade mark application No 7 007 909
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 August 2019 in Case R 386/2019-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—vary the contested decision and reject the opposition;
—in the alternative, annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Second Board of Appeal and in the present proceedings.
—infringement of Article 42(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;
—infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.