- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-540/11: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Melkveebedrijf Overenk and Others v Commission (Action for damages — Levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EC) No 1468/2006 — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TB0540
62011TB0540
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.11.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 336/23
(Case T-540/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Action for damages - Levy in the milk and milk products sector - Regulation (EC) No 1468/2006 - Manifest inadmissibility)
2013/C 336/47
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicants: Melkveebedrijf Overenk BV (Sint Anthonis, Netherlands); Maatschap Veehouderij Kwakernaak (Oosterwolde, Netherlands); Mulders Agro vof (Heerle, Netherlands); Melkveebedrijf Engelen vof (Grashoek, Netherlands); Melkveebedrijf De Peel BV (Heusden, Netherlands); and Mathijs Moonen (Nederweert, Netherlands) (represented by P. Mazel and A. van Beelen, lawyers)
Defendants: European Commission (represented by Z. Malůšková and B. Burggraaf, acting as Agents)
Re:
Claim for damages for the loss allegedly caused to the applicants by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1468/2006 of 4 October 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector (OJ 2006 L 274, p. 6).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Melkveebedrijf Overenk BV, Maatschap Veehouderij Kwakernaak, Mulders Agro vof, Melkveebedrijf Engelen vof, Melkveebedrijf De Peel BV and Mr Mathijs Moonen are ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.