- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-132/16: Action brought on 23 March 2016 — PayPal v EUIPO — Hub Culture (VENMO)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0132
62016TN0132
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.5.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 191/37
(Case T-132/16)
(2016/C 191/49)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: PayPal, Inc. (San Jose, California, United States) (represented by: A. Renck, lawyer and I. Junkar, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hub Culture Ltd (Hamilton, Bermuda)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘VENMO’ — EU trade mark No 9 509 357
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 January 2016 in Case R 2974/2014-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order that the costs of the proceeding be borne by EUIPO and by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal if it joins as intervener.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.