I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2013/C 207/64
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: José Castell Macía (Elche, Spain) (represented by: G. Marín Raigal, P. López Ronda, H. Mosback and G. Macias Bonilla, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: PJ Hungary Szolgáltató kft (PJ Hungary kft) (Budapest, Hungary)
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 7 February 2013 in Case R 1401/2012-1 so as to dismiss the opposition filed and grant the Community trade mark application No 6 798 862‘PEPE CASTELL’, and order the opponent to pay the costs of both sets of proceedings;
—order OHIM, as defendant, to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant in the present action;
—if necessary, order the intervener to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant in these proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: José Castell Macía
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘PEPE CASTELL’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 25 and 39 — Community trade mark application No 6 798 862
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: PJ Hungary Szolgáltató kft
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark with word elements ‘Pepe Jeans FOOTWEAR’ for goods in Class 25
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009