EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-598/21: Action brought on 20 September 2021 — Euranimi v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0598

62021TN0598

September 20, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 452/45

(Case T-598/21)

(2021/C 452/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, P. Gjørtler and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1029 of 24 June 2021, amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/159 to prolong the safeguard measure on imports of certain steel products (OJ 2021, L 225I, p. 1);

order the European Commission to bear the costs of the applicant’s legal costs in the present proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the Commission breaches the article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2015/478 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 march 2015 on common rules for imports (1) by committing a manifest error of assessment in the determination of serious injury and likelihood of serious injury;

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission’s assessments of the relevant market data and the counterfactual related to terminating the safeguards are manifestly erroneous. Considering the exceptional world market situation, the Commission also breaches its duty to take into account the post investigating period (IP) year 2021 situation.

(1) OJ L 83, p. 16, 27.3.2015

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia