- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-73/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 28 September 2015 — Kriscak v Europol (Civil Service — Europol staff — Europol Convention — Staff Regulations of Europol — Annex 1 to the Staff Regulations of Europol — List of the posts given in bold characters which may be occupied only by a person recruited from a competent authority within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Europol Convention — Restricted posts — Europol Decision — Posts which may be occupied only by a person recruited from a competent authority within the meaning of Article 3 of the Europol Decision — Application of the CEOS to Europol staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term temporary contract — Refusal to grant a temporary contract of undetermined duration — Action for annulment — Action for compensation)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FB0073
62014FB0073
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.11.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 371/46
(Case F-73/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil Service - Europol staff - Europol Convention - Staff Regulations of Europol - Annex 1 to the Staff Regulations of Europol - List of the posts given in bold characters which may be occupied only by a person recruited from a competent authority within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Europol Convention - Restricted posts - Europol Decision - Posts which may be occupied only by a person recruited from a competent authority within the meaning of Article 3 of the Europol Decision - Application of the CEOS to Europol staff - Non-renewal of a fixed-term temporary contract - Refusal to grant a temporary contract of undetermined duration - Action for annulment - Action for compensation))
(2015/C 371/48)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Christiana Kriscak (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: D. Neumann, J. Arnould and C. Falmagne, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s contract and for compensation for the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.
2.The European Police Office shall bear its own costs and shall pay one third of the costs incurred by Ms Kriscak.
3.Ms Kriscak shall bear two thirds of her own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 380, 27.10.2014, p. 27.