- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-60/20: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2021 — Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v EUIPO (MASTIHACARE) (EU trade mark — International Registration designating the European Union — Word mark MASTIHACARE — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0060
62020TA0060
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.11.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 471/45
(Case T-60/20)
(EU trade mark - International Registration designating the European Union - Word mark MASTIHACARE - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2021/C 471/62)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou (Chios, Greece) (represented by: A.-E. Malami, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 November 2019 (Case R 692/2019-1), relating to the international registration of the word mark MASTIHACARE designating the European Union.
Operative part of the judgment
The General Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou to pay the costs.
OJ C 103, 30.3.2020.