I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-726/14) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Non-contractual liability - Proof of the existence, validity and scope of protection of the earlier mark - International registration designating the European Union - Decision rejecting the opposition in the absence of proof of the earlier right - Rule 19(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Revision of the decision - Article 62(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Damage consisting in lawyers’ fees - Causal link))
(2017/C 104/59)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Novar GmbH (Albstadt, Germany) (represented by: R. Weede, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)
Application pursuant to Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for material damage which the applicant allegedly sustained on account of lawyers’ fees that it incurred in an appeal against a decision of the Opposition Division allegedly adopted in breach of Rule 19(2)(a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark and of general legal principles.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Novar GmbH and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) each to bear their own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 7, 12.1.2015.