- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-290/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2011 — Sports Warehouse v OHIM (TENNIS WAREHOUSE) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark TENNIS WAREHOUSE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Distinctive character — Obligation to state reasons — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TA0290
62010TA0290
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.1.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 13/13
(Case T-290/10) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark TENNIS WAREHOUSE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Distinctive character - Obligation to state reasons - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 13/27
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Sports Warehouse GmbH (Schutterwald, Germany) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially S. Schäffner and subsequently R. Pethke, Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 April 2010 (Case R 1259/2009-1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign TENNIS WAREHOUSE as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Sports Warehouse GmbH to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
* * *
Language of the case: German.