I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(C/2025/4312)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Netcompany SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Central Bank
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul the Decision of the ECB of 2 May 2025 rejecting the applicant’s tender in the procurement procedure ‘Digital Euro – App & SDK (PRO-009488)’;
—annul the Decision of the ECB’s Procurement Review Body of 22 May 2025;
—order the ECB to pay all the legal fees and costs.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.
2.Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of the principle of proportionality and of the principle of good administration in combination with the provisions of Article 3 and 13(6) of Decision (EU) 2016/245 of the European Central Bank. (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
Decision (EU) 2016/245 of the European Central Bank of 9 February 2016 laying down the rules on procurement (recast) (ECB/2016/2) (OJ 2016 L 45, p. 15).
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4312/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—