EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-542/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2023 –Martin Rodrigo v EUIPO — Louis Vuitton Malletier (CALIFORNIA Dreaming by Made in California) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark CALIFORNIA Dreaming by Made in California — Earlier Benelux word mark CALIFORNIA DREAM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0542

62022TA0542

October 11, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/982

27.11.2023

(Case T-542/22) (*)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark CALIFORNIA Dreaming by Made in California - Earlier Benelux word mark CALIFORNIA DREAM - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(C/2023/982)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Andres Carlos Martin Rodrigo (Fuente el Saz de Jarama, Spain) (represented by: J. Donoso Romero, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Louis Vuitton Malletier (Paris, France) (represented by J. Blanchard, lawyer)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 June 2022 (Case R 2242/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Mr Andres Carlos Martin Rodrigo to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by Louis Vuitton Malletier;

3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.

*

(*) Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/982/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia