- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-1146/23: Action brought on 8 December 2023 — W. L. Gore & Associates v EUIPO — Angiokard med. Spritzguß (Cardioflow)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1146
62023TN1146
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/977
29.1.2024
(Case T-1146/23)
(C/2024/977)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: W. L. Gore & Associates Inc. (Newark, Delaware, United States) (represented by: C. Tenkhoff and T. Herzog, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Angiokard med. Spritzguß GmbH (Friedeburg, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Cardioflow — Application for registration No 18 115 661
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 September 2023 in Case R 739/2023-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/977/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)