I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2014/C 45/62
Language in which the application was lodged: Czech
Applicant: Granette & Starorežná Distilleries a.s. (Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic) (represented by: T. Chleboun, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bacardi Co. Ltd (Vaduz, Liechtenstein)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—join the proceedings in this case to the proceedings in Case T-435/12;
—dismiss the action brought by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal against the defendant’s decision of 9 July 2012 in Case R 2100/2011-2 (Case T-435/12);
—alter the defendant’s decision of 16 September 2013 in Case R 1605/2012-2 so as to reject the form of order sought by the other party to the proceedings No B 1753550 against the application for the Community trade mark ‘42 VODKA JEMNÁ VODKA VYRÁBĚNÁ JEDINEČNOU TECHNOLOGIÍ 42 % vol’;
—order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the applicant’s costs in the proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Granette & Starorežná Distilleries
Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘42 VODKA JEMNÁ VODKA VYRÁBĚNÁ JEDINEČNOU TECHNOLOGIÍ 42 % vol.’
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Bacardi Co. Ltd
Mark or sign cited in opposition: International and national trade mark containing the word element ‘42 BELOW’
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation