EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Rectification order of 4 December 2023.#ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission.#Rectification order.#Case C-249/23 P.

ECLI:EU:C:2023:953

62023CO0249(02)

December 4, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT

4 December 2023 (*1)

(Rectification order)

In Case C‑249/23 P-REC,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 18 April 2023,

ClientEarth AISBL, established in Brussels (Belgium), represented initially by O.W. Brouwer and T.C. van Helfteren, and subsequently by O.W. Brouwer, T.C. van Helfteren and M.C. Lawton, advocaten,

appellant,

the other party to the proceedings being:

European Commission, represented by C. Ehrbar, G. Gattinara and A. Spina, acting as Agents,

defendant at first instance,

THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT,

after hearing the Advocate General, M. Szpunar,

makes the following

1On 6 November 2023, the President of the Court of Justice made the order in ClientEarth v Commission (C‑249/23 P, EU:C:2023:828).

2That order contains errors which it is appropriate for the Court to rectify of its own motion, pursuant to Article 154(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, which applies to the procedure on appeal under Article 190(1) of those rules.

On those grounds, the President of the Court hereby orders:

1.Paragraph 12 of the order of the President of the Court of Justice of 6 November 2023, ClientEarth v Commission (C‑249/23 P, EU:C:2023:828) shall be rectified as follows:

‘Lastly, they submit that, since their interest is distinct from that of the Parliament and that institution is not even a party to the present case, their situation must be distinguished from that at issue in the order of 3 July 1986, France v Parliament (C‑358/85, EU:C:1986:286), in which an application to intervene submitted by Members of the Parliament had been rejected.’

2.The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified order. A note of this order shall be made in the margin of the original of the rectified order.

Luxembourg, 4 December 2023.

Registrar

K. Lenaerts

President

(*1) Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia