I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-377/18) (*)
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents held by EMA containing information submitted by the applicants in the context of the marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Ocaliva - Decision to grant a third party access to a document - Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings)
(2019/C 288/64)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Intercept Pharma Ltd (Bristol, United Kingdom) and Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (New York, New York, United States), (represented by: L. Tsang, J. Mulryne, E. Amos and H. Kerr-Peterson, Solicitors, and F. Campbell, Barrister)
Defendant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: initially by S. Marino, S. Drosos, A. Rusanov and T. Jabłoński, and subsequently by S. Marino, S. Drosos, T. Jabłoński, R. Pita and G. Gavriilidou, Agents)
Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of EMA decision ASK-40399 of 15 May 2018, granting to a third party, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), access to a document containing information submitted in the context of an application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Ocaliva.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Intercept Pharma Ltd and Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2019:140