I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Appeals – Directive 2004/52/EC – Interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community – Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded
Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Directive on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community – Action brought by a supplier of those systems (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; European Parliament and Council Directive 2004/52) (see paras 36-42)
Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 22 January 2008 in Case T-298/04 Efkon v Parliament and Council, by which that Court dismissed as inadmissible the action for annulment of Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 124) – Requirement that the contested measure should be of individual concern – Right to a fair hearing – Duration of the proceedings before the Court of First Instance.
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Efkon AG is ordered to pay the costs.