EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-109/13: Action brought on 4th November 2013 — ZZ v ENISA

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013FN0109

62013FN0109

November 4, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

18.1.2014

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/21

(Case F-109/13)

2014/C 15/33

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: Agence européenne chargée de la sécurité des réseaux et de l’information (ENISA)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the Decision terminating the Applicant’s contract of employment and as a consequence, to order to the Defendant her reintegration, the payment of her financial benefits since the entering into effect of the contract termination until her reintegration, with the deduction of her possible income for the same period, increased by late interests calculated at the rate of the European Central Bank plus 3 points, and, finally, to order the Defendant to compensate the moral prejudice of the Applicant.

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of 31 January 2013 terminating the Applicant’s contract of employment;

annul the decision of 22 August 2013 rejecting the Applicant’s complaint;

as a consequence, to order to reintegrate the Applicant and to pay her financial benefits since the entering into effect of the contract termination until her reintegration, with the deduction of her possible income for the same period, increased by late interests calculated at the rate of the European Central Bank plus 3 points;

to compensate the moral prejudice of the Applicant evaluated, ex aequo et bono, at 10 000 euros;

order to the Defendant to bear the entire costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia