I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Appeal - State aid - Environmental levy on aggregates in the United Kingdom)
(2009/C 44/06)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: British Aggregates Association (represented by: C. Pouncey, Solicitor, and L. Van den Hende, advocaat)
Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Flett, B. Martenczuk and T. Scharf, Agents); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: T. Harris, M. Hall and G. Facenna, Agents)
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 September 2006 in Case T-210/02 British Aggregates Association v Commission, by which the Court of First Instance rejected as unfounded an application for the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2002) 1478 final of 24 April 2002 not to raise objections to the system of levies on quarry aggregates in the United Kingdom (State aid 863/01 — United Kingdom, Aggregates Levy)
The Court (Third Chamber):
1.Sets aside the judgment delivered by the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 13 September 2006 in Case T-210/02 British Aggregates Association v Commission;
2.Refers the case back to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities;
3.Reserves the costs.
(1) OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.