- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-405/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Višje sodišče v Mariboru (Slovenia) lodged on 30 June 2021 — FV v NOVA KREDITNA BANKA MARIBOR d.d.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0405
62021CN0405
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 349/23
(Case C-405/21)
(2021/C 349/30)
Language of the case: Slovene
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: FV
Respondent: NOVA KREDITNA BANKA MARIBOR d.d.
Question referred
Is Article 3(1), read in conjunction with Articles 8 and 8a, of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) to be interpreted as not precluding national provisions which characterise the two conditions of ‘good faith’ and ‘a significant imbalance’ as alternatives (as separate, autonomous and independent conditions), such that, for the purposes of deciding whether a contractual term is unfair, it is sufficient if facts exist which establish that just one of those two conditions is fulfilled?
(1) Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).
* * *
Language of the case: Slovene