- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-375/22: Action brought on 21 June 2022 — Izuzquiza and Others v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0375
62022TN0375
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.8.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 326/21
(Case T-375/22)
(2022/C 326/28)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Luisa Izuzquiza (Berlin, Germany), Arne Semsrott (Berlin), Stefan Wehrmeyer (Berlin) (represented by: J. Pobjoy, Barrister-at-Law)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, the final decision of the European Parliament, reference A(2021)10718C, dated 8 April 2022, insofar as the European Parliament concluded that it was entitled to rely upon (i) Article 4(1)(b) and/or (ii) Article 4(6) of Regulation No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), to justify full and/or partial non-disclosure of the documents requested by the applicants in their confirmatory application dated 28 February 2022; and
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the European Parliament has infringed Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the European Parliament has infringed Article 4(6) of Regulation No 1049/2001.
(1) Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).