EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-115/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 June 2020 — China Construction Bank Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Groupement des cartes bancaires (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Opposition — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Assessment of the similarity of the signs at issue — Assessment of the distinctive character of the earlier mark)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0115

62019CA0115

June 11, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

17.8.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/13

(Case C-115/19 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Opposition - Article 8(1)(b) - Likelihood of confusion - Assessment of the similarity of the signs at issue - Assessment of the distinctive character of the earlier mark)

(2020/C 271/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: China Construction Bank Corp. (represented by: A. Carboni and J. Gibbs, Solicitors)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and D. Botis, acting as Agents), Groupement des cartes bancaires (represented by: C. Herissay-Ducamp, lawyer)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 6 December 2018, China Construction Bank v EUIPO — Groupement des cartes bancaires (CCB) (T-665/17, EU:T:2018:879);

2.Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 June 2017 (Case R 2265/2016-1);

3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by China Construction Bank Corp. in the present appeal and half of the costs incurred by China Construction Bank Corp. in the proceedings at first instance;

4.Orders the Groupement des cartes bancaires to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by China Construction Bank Corp. in the proceedings at first instance.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia