- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-678/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 November 2019 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Designs — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Article 90(1) — Provisional and protective measures — Jurisdiction of national courts of first instance — Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts designated in that provision)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0678
62018CA0678
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.1.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 27/7
(Case C-678/18) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Designs - Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Article 90(1) - Provisional and protective measures - Jurisdiction of national courts of first instance - Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts designated in that provision)
(2020/C 27/08)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden
Operative part of the judgment
Article 90(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs must be interpreted as meaning that the courts and tribunals of the Member States with jurisdiction to order provisional measures, including protective measures, in respect of a national design also have jurisdiction to order such measures in respect of a Community design.
(*) Language of the case: Dutch.
ECLI:EU:C:2020:140
* * *
(1) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.