EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-530/17: Action brought on 11 August 2017 — López Campo and Others v SRB

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0530

62017TN0530

August 11, 2017
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/21

(Case T-530/17)

(2017/C 369/32)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Mario López Campo (Pontevedra, Spain) and eight other applicants (represented by: F. Cabadas García, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

Annul Decision SRD/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board, which it adopted on 7 June 2017, putting the institution Banco Popular Español S.A. under resolution as of 7 June 2017 and declare that the Board is responsible for compensating the applicants in the amounts set out in the application;

In the alternative, annul Decision SRD/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board, which it adopted on 7 June 2017, putting the institution Banco Popular Español S.A. under resolution as of 7 June 2017 and declare that the Board is responsible for compensating the applicants in the amounts resulting from the multiplication of the number of their shares by the final listing price prior to Decision SRD/EES/2017/08.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action concerns the Decision of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 (SRB/EES/2017/08) allowing the resolution of the Banco Popular Español, S.A.

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia