I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
17.6.2024
(Case C-213/24, Grzera)
(C/2024/3594)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: E.T.
Other party to the proceedings: Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu
1.Must the provisions of Directive [2006/112], and in particular Articles 2(1) and 9(1) of that directive, be interpreted as meaning that a person who sells an immovable property, which was not previously used for economic activity, and commissions the preparation for sale [of that property] to a professional trader who subsequently, as that person’s agent, undertakes a series of organised activities with the aim of dividing the property and selling it for a higher price, independently carries out an economic activity?
2.Must the provisions of Directive [2006/112], and in particular Article 9(1) of that directive, be interpreted as meaning that each of the cooperating spouses is to be considered a person who independently carries out an economic activity?
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3594/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—