- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-452/24, Lunapark Scandinavia: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 26 June 2024 – Oy Lunapark Scandinavia Ltd v Hardeco Finland Oy
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0452
62024CN0452
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/5221
(Case C-452/24, Lunapark Scandinavia)
(C/2024/5221)
Language of the case: Finnish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Oy Lunapark Scandinavia Ltd
Respondent: Hardeco Finland Oy
Question referred
Does Article 10 of Trade Mark Directive (EU) 2015/2436 preclude the application, in a dispute concerning a trade mark infringement, of a national principle whereby the proprietor of a trade mark, also in cases other than those covered by Article 18(1) and Article 9(1) or (2) of the Trade Mark Directive, could forfeit the right conferred on him or her by Article 10(2) and (3) to prohibit a third party from using a sign the use of which adversely affects or is liable adversely to affect one of the functions of the trade mark, on the ground that, though being aware of the use of the mark, he or she has not applied for prohibition of that use within a reasonable time?
Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 2015 L 336, p. 1).
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5221/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: Finnish.