I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-567/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Tax provisions - Excise duty - Directive 92/83/EEC - Article 27(1)(b) - Exemptions - Definition of ‘products not for human consumption’ - Assessment criteria)
(2019/C 139/12)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Applicant: ‘Bene Factum’ UAB
Defendant: Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos
1.Article 27(1)(b) of Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonization of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages must be interpreted as applying to ethyl alcohol that has been denatured in accordance with the requirements of a Member State and is contained in cosmetics or mouthwashes which, although not intended, as such, for human consumption, are nevertheless consumed as alcoholic beverages by certain individuals.
2.Article 27(1)(b) of Directive 92/83 must be interpreted as applying to ethyl alcohol that has been denatured in accordance with the requirements of a Member State and is contained in cosmetics or mouthwashes which, although not intended, as such, for human consumption, are nevertheless consumed as alcoholic beverages by certain individuals, when the person who imports those products from a Member State in order for them to be supplied to the end consumers in the Member State of destination by other persons, knowing that they are also consumed as alcoholic beverages, has them manufactured and labelled with that in mind in order to increase the sale of those products.
Language of the case: Lithuanian
(1) OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.