I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2008/C 197/57)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Lemans Corporation (Janesville, United States) (represented by: M. Cover, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Stephen Turner (Luddington, United Kingdom)
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 March 2008 in case R 589/2007-2;
—declare that the opposition be dismissed and that Community trade mark concerned may proceed to registration; and
—order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs, including the appeals before the Board of Appeal and the Court of First Instance.
Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘ICON’ for goods and services in classes 9, 18 and 25 — application No 2 197 366
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited: The national word mark ‘IKON’ for goods in class 9 — UK trade mark registration No 2 243 676
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the application in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law: The Board of Appeal erred in its finding that the other party to the proceedings before it had locus standi to file the opposition.