- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber, extended composition) of 30 June 1998. # British Shoe Corporation Footwear Supplies Ltd, Clark International Ltd, Deichmann-Schuhe GmbH & Co. Vertriebs KG, Groupe André SA, Reno Versandhandel GmbH and Leder & Schuh AG v Commission of the European Communities. # Dumping - Textile footwear originating in the People's Republic of China and Indonesia - Commission Regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty - Action for annulment - Subsequent regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty - No need to adjudicate. # Case T-73/97.
ECLI:EU:T:1998:147
61997TO0073
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Avis juridique important
61997B0073
European Court reports 1998 Page II-02619
Summary
Keywords
Actions for annulment - Action contesting a regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty - Supervening regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty - Effects on the interest in bringing an action (EC Treaty, Art. 173)
Summary
An importer cannot rely on any legal effect arising from a regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty in order to establish an interest in challenging it before the Community judicature, if the amounts which it had to pay under that provisional regulation have been definitively collected at the rate laid down by the definitive regulation and the amounts which exceeded that rate, or related to products no longer affected by the anti-dumping duty, have been definitively released.